Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Linkedin button



The Downside Of Obsession Of University Ranking In Singapore

June 6, 2013 | Author: | Posted in College and University

Firstly , it really is without any doubt that the continuously superb standing of NUS inside the worldwide university education landscape is a robust testimonial of the weight of the institution.

The speedy advancement of the university can even be noticed from casual observation without the need of the in-depth analysis by THE. With regards to research, the NUS medical school has forged alliance with the Duke Medical School, 1 of the best in the United states of america. The joint program motivates partnership in research as well as student exchange.

In relation to student growth, the University Scholars Program and also the U-town residential program have included substantially diverseness into students’ academic life, ushering in american education technique within a liberal arts environment.

As a result, it may not be unexpected to find out the standing of NUS climb swiftly, as well as its standing within Singapore along with the entire world, a reputation that is definitely vital to draw the best university students along with instructors, whose influx enhances a virtuous cycle of the university’s improvement.

However, you will discover prospective problems regarding the preoccupation with ranking by college as well as the general local community as a whole. The current method in assessing college is far from ideal and frequently open to critiques. Weight assigned to many areas, no matter how thoroughly conceived, is basically arbitrary.

One particular significant area of question lies with the balance involving research and teaching. A professor is required to dedicate time in teaching undergrads and doing research for the purpose of publications. The former is considered as being the principal goal of building a college although the latter is generally considered as a better criterion while looking for the ranking of a college.

If a lot of emphasis is on how many quality papers a university has published inside the first-tier global journals, for instance, this type of evaluation bias might be translated into demand for professors to publish.

Various universities, like Hong Kong University, have even set up a minimal quota on the number of papers to be published every thing. Even in the lack of an explicit quota, as in the instance of NUS, implicit stress of relating publication to tenure overview is sufficient to nail the idea of ‘publish or perish’ inside the heads of academicians.

Cost in putting more time in research is normally less time or focus devoted to undergrad training. That is usually noticed in scarcity of fervour from professors or low availability of tutors who seem normally pre-occupied.

At the end of the day, what will society stand to reap if higher university standing primarily reflects greater quality research that’s primarily irrelevant to students?

Moreover, some important components of higher education might be underrepresented in review of colleges and universities. Regardless of the excellent ranking of NUS, 1 problem remains unresolved by the university: academic liberty or autonomy. University as a concept connotes freedom of thinking and expression that are vehicle of intellectual advancement of society.

On the other hand, NUS and quite a few other Asian educational institutions embarrassingly usually do not get outstanding credit for that facet. Actually, NUS president, Professor Tan Chorh Chuan stated following the release of ranking that NUS continued progress is a outcome of constant help from the Singapore government. That is already a proof of the close tie between NUS along with the government. In actual fact, much of the college funds originates from the government.

The undermine in academic independence is best noticed within the political science division of NUS which has come under scrutiny for its very clear lack of critical voices. The division has been labeled as “docile”, unwilling to maintain itself as an impartial voice within the political discussion.

In contrast, largest percentage of the honorable educational facilities overseas are privately owned and they have substantially higher freedom of intellectual inquiry that consequently benefits the whole community.

In fact, the establishment of Yale-NUS Liberal Arts College some years ago caused substantially discontentment around the move in the Yale community that views the Singapore political environment as not really favorable forliberal arts learning.

It’s suffice to say that in addition to improving university ranking, the institution also should have to meet its social expectation by determining a fine line between getting government backing and remaining politically neutral.

Undoubtedly before it renders THE pleased , it need to satisfy Singapore students, social observers and educators 1st, who are the true stakeholders of the education within the nation.

The author is a graduate of the university in Singapore and has been blogging about studying in singapore in the last 5 years. Since his graduation, he has been offering home tuition to students , enabling them to realize their goal of being a graduate in a prestigious university.

Author:

This author has published 2 articles so far. More info about the author is coming soon.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.